<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 400+ DOM in Arcadia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arcadiahousingblog.com/2008/04/01/400-dom-in-arcadia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arcadiahousingblog.com/2008/04/01/400-dom-in-arcadia/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Arcadia and San Gabriel Valley Housing Market</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inventory &#38; Market Report - 5/10/08 &#124; Arcadia Housing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.arcadiahousingblog.com/2008/04/01/400-dom-in-arcadia/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>Inventory &#38; Market Report - 5/10/08 &#124; Arcadia Housing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 13:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcadiahousingblog.com/2008/04/01/400-dom-in-arcadia/#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>[...] investor/developer who built these can&#8217;t afford to sell them for under $700,000. We profiled unit #B back in April that one eventually sold for $735,000 after sitting for 400+ days on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] investor/developer who built these can&#8217;t afford to sell them for under $700,000. We profiled unit #B back in April that one eventually sold for $735,000 after sitting for 400+ days on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
