No Poo for Winnie – 100% Return after 5 years?

41 E Winnie Way
Arcadia, CA 91006


Price: $850,000 ($546/sf)

  • Beds: 3
  • Baths: 1.75
  • Sq. Ft.: 1,557
  • Lot Size: 8,100 Sq. Ft.

This is a fairly decent starter home built in 1956. While it lacks the charm or extravagance of newer properties, you get adequate living area, privacy and some upgraded features. Unfortunately, the $850,000 price tag puts this home way beyond the classification of “entry” or “starter”.

First, the seller. They bought in 2003 for $430,000 and put a sizable 42% down payment. Regardless of where the money came from, it was very prudent borrowing. Assuming a 30-year mortgage, their monthly payment should be around $1,500/month. More or less depending on the interest rate.

A $1,500 mortgage on a this property is very reasonable due to the $180,000 down payment. BUT take that $180k and apply it to the current listing price and we have a mortgage of $4,297 per month; not including taxes, insurance, ect. Would you spend $4,300+ a month to own this home?

Given that a property like this will go for $300/sf or less in the near future, the following valuations are still too high:

After 5 years of ownership.

3%    $498,488    ($320/sf)
4%    $523,161    ($336/sf)
5%    $548,801    ($352/sf)
6%    $575,437    ($370/sf)
7%    $603,097    ($387/sf)

$300/sf = $467,100

Current asking price: $850,000 WTF

If I was the seller, I would start slashing the listing price ASAP because once the Summer season is over, we’re looking at a even bleaker housing market the coming Fall and Winter.

7,000sf McMansion in Arcadia

2222 S. 2nd Ave.
Arcadia, CA 91006

Price: $2,888,000 ($414/sf)

  • Beds: 5
  • Baths: 5.5
  • Sq. Ft.: 6,981(!)
  • Lot Size: 0.38 Acres

Today’s new listing is a 6,981sf McMansion sprawled across a 1/3 acre piece of land. The description calls it a “Gorgeous Luxury Custom Built Estate.” Of course, we all know that this “custom home” was built using a mid-90′s floor plan and originally designed by San Gabriel Valley architects. Don’t believe me? Walk into a dozen McMansions built between 1995-1999 and you will see the same plans used over and over.

There are two things that are rediculous about this property: 1) The nearly 7,000sf living space and 2) a asking price of $2.8MM+. Do you think adding the ‘888‘ will increase this seller’s luck in finding a rich knifecatcher?

Cost to build this McMansion @ $150/sf = $1,047,150
Cost of property purchased in 2003 = $636,000

Total cost = $1,683,150

Current asking price: $2,888,000 = $1,204,850 profit (!)

What does not make sense is why someone would spend nearly $3MM to purchase an overbuilt McMansion when they could build the same thing for much much less. There are several land lots in Arcadia currently asking for ~$1MM. Assuming you spent another $1MM building a custom home, total savings would be over $800k!

$1.3MM for Land

48 W Le Roy Ave.
Arcadia, CA 91007

Price: $1,300,000 ($754/sf)

  • Beds: 4
  • Baths: 2
  • Sq. Ft.: 1,725
  • Lot Size: 0.44 Acres

This seller did not provide any photos so I’m unable to comment on the physical condition of the home.  All we have for now is a street photo (above) and the following description:

Incredible Value!! One of the best Million Dollar Area. Warm, Cozy home with wood laminating and tile through out. Great back yard with sparkling and gated pool. Guest House over looking the pool and Jacuzzi. This property is good for investor who wants to get immediate income or Built your own Dream Home.

This is a direct copy and paste. The strange use of capital letters and grammar mistakes belong exclusively to the agent. My writing isn’t great but for a potential $39,000 in commissions (3% x $1.3MM), I would make sure this listing is at least presentable.  Hey, maybe the Realtor even knows this is a WTF asking price and no one in their right mind would purchase the 88 year old property for $1,300,000, a whopping $754/sf.

Although here is nothing to indicate that this home was recently remolded or even upgraded, the property looks to be well maintained and shows a lot of potential.

People who tell you that it’s okay to buy now if you plan to hold it for 5-7 years are like the Wall Street idiots who forget any event that is over 4 months. Take a look at the sales history:

Dec. 1988 $500,000
May 1994 $450,000 -1.9%/yr

The 1988 buyer waited 6 years after buying near the peak of that era’s bubble. The result? He lost $50,000 plus several years of paid interest. That was just a 10% loss… can you imagine current buyers who are facing 25-40% price declines?

Using the ’94 sales price, here is my valuation of 448 W. Le Roy:

3%    $680,665    ($395/sf)
4%    $779,254    ($452/sf)
5%    $890,969    ($517/sf)
6%    $1,017,407  ($590/sf)

At nearly half an acre and sitting on a half decent street, I can see someone purchasing this property for around $1,000,000; it’s fundemental value is obviously a lot less. Essentially, you will be acquiring a large piece of dirt… perfect for another Arcadia McMansion.

Bi-Annual Sales Report

The June 2008 housing numbers are in so I’ll leave these up over the weekend. We’ve gone ahead and compiled the figures for the entire first half of 2008. I would love to here your thoughts!

Arcadia Homes Sales Data

Something tells me that this trend will continue for the rest of the year. This data shows that the “high-end” homes aren’t selling like they did during the peak of the bubble. And you know why? It’s because anybody who could afford the 20-30% downpayment on a million-dollar plus property is probably smart enough to know that real estate appreciation is dead for the next several years and they are better off investing that cash.

Have you heard about Wachovia and their whopping $8.8 billion loss due to the housing and credit crisis? That is no small change folks. Our friends on Wall Street are currently trading assets at pennies to the dollar because what used to be a hot item (i.e. real estate) is now considered the worst investment anybody could hold.

Of course, you already know this. Housing was never meant to be commonly traded as a liquid asset and it never will (except during a bubble!). But tell that to the 200+ sellers currently on the market and you’ll sure to be stoned.

A freeway-loaded Lorena

605 Lorena Ave.
Arcadia, CA 91006

Price: $695,000 ($363/sf)

  • Beds: 4
  • Baths: 3
  • Sq. Ft.: 1,915
  • Lot Size: 4,918 Sq. Ft.

I’ll great straight to it. This is a 32 year old freeway-loaded property. It is definitely in need of some TLC… no, scratch that. This home needs a complete renovation.

Did I mention that your neighbor is the 210 freeway?

This property was purchased in 1999 for $243,000. The current listing price is 3x that.

Valuation after 9 years of ownership:

3%  $317,060 ($166 /sf)
4%  $345,865 ($181 /sf)
5%  $376,973 ($197 /sf)
6%  $410,543 ($214 /sf)
7%  $446,746 ($233 /sf)

Currently listing for $695,000 ($363/sf)

So even assuming an above-average appreciation of 7% a year, the home is a quarter million dollars overpriced. Now, I don’t consider this move-in ready so $197/sf is a more reasonable valuation at $376,973.

13 years of depreciation

For those who enjoy the Victorian style homes, here’s a special one; a 4,693sf single story property sitting on .41 acres. It was remodeled in 2002 and it looks to be in great condition inside and out.

1910 S 2nd Ave.
Arcadia, CA 91006

Price: $1,380,000 ($294/sf)

  • Beds: 4
  • Baths: 4
  • Sq. Ft.: 4,693
  • Lot Size: 0.41 Acres

From the listing:

This is a lucky house, owner has moved to a multi-million dollar home. Price right for quick sale.

Price right, you say? Although this home was upgraded in 2002, is it enough to warrant a $500,000 premium over the 2002 purchase price? Is the seller moving into a multi-million dollar home because some knife catcher is going to pay for it?

Sales History

Feb. 1989 $1,100,000 ($234/sf)
May 1992 $970,000 ($206/sf)
July 1995 $777,000 ($165/sf)
Apr. 2002 $850,000 ($181/sf)

This is exactly why you never want to buy during the peak of a bubble. As we can see here, the 1989 buyer would have lost money on his home even after 13 years of ownership! This is why I believe renting, even at the cost of inconvenience (i.e. school, children, relocation, ect), is worth it when home prices are highly inflated.

I know family members who decided not to sell their home during the peak of the bubble because it was “troublesome” to move everything and rent a smaller place. Now that prices are declining, they are regretting the decision to not cash in on $600k of pure equity.

On the other hand, I also know people who bought during the last 2 years because prices have “softened” and they would be living in it for 5-7 years. Of course, they are now freaking out because it’s very possible their home would be underwater that entire time… or even longer.

But I digress. Here is my evaluation:

After 6 years of ownership…

3%    $1,014,944    ($216/sf)
4%    $1,075,521    ($229/sf)
5%    $1,139,081    ($243/sf)
6%    $1,205,741    ($257/sf)

Currently listing for $1,380,000 ($294/sf)

Based on the 6% figure, would you rent if it could save you $180,000 over the next 2 years?

The price is NOT right on Drake

Today’s new listing is a property that, for the right price, would be a decent home. Although it backs up against Michillinda, you get decent living space, a 10,400sf lot and what looks like a floor plan that can be worked with. Of course, the asking price of $788,000 rubbish….

1151 Drake Rd.
Arcadia, CA 91007

Price: $788,000 ($485/sf)

  • Beds: 3
  • Baths: 2
  • Sq. Ft.: 1,626
  • Lot Size: 10,400 Sq. Ft.

Unlike most properties that slowly appreciated in value between 1996 and 2003, this one got an early start on the bubble:

Sales History
Sep. 1998 $310,000 ($190/sf)
Apr. 2000 $400,000 ($246/sf)
July 2002 $486,000 ($299/sf)

The last 2 owners made approximately $90,000 after two years of ownership. The current seller is aiming for a $302,000 profit after just 6 years! If this was 2006, I would have no doubt that this home would sell between $800 – 900k. Well, that is no longer the case and a $485/sf asking price for this 57 year old home unrealistic.

Straightline appreciation from 2002 gives us the following values:

3%    $580,309    ($357/sf)
4%    $614,945    ($378/sf)
5%    $651,286    ($401/sf)
6%    $689,400    ($424/sf)

My suggestion? List the property at $600k and allow the knife catchers or sideliners bid up the finals sales price. This is a sure way to get a quick sale and still walk away with a sizable profit.