post Author: SavedbyGrace post Comments (71) postDecember 22, 2008

According to CNN,

“The housing market hasn’t bottomed out yet. For the third quarter, the closely-watched S&P Case-Shiller national home-price index fell 16.6%, and experts are predicting further declines. Of the top 100 markets, here are 10 with the worst forecasts.”

And out of those 10, 8 of them are in California. This isn’t news to the California housing bloggers, but it may be shocking news to most California homeowner/debtors. The numbers are staggering and things don’t look too good for the next few years. Here’s the data for these 10 areas that includes this year’s median price and the projected change change up to 2010.

1) Los Angeles, CA (LA/LongBeach/Glendale)
2008 median house price $375,340
2009 projected change -24.9%
2010 projected change -5.1%

2) Stockton, CA
2008 median house price $248,050
2009 projected change -24.7%
2010 projected change -4.0%

3) Riverside, CA
2008 median house price $256,540
2009 projected change -23.3%
2010 projected change -4.8%

4) Miami, Miami Beach
2008 median house price $293,590
2009 projected change -22.8%
2010 projected change -6.4%

5) Sacramento, CA
2008 median house price $225,140
2009 projected change -22.2%
2010 projected change -2.3%

6) Santa Ana/Anaheim, CA
2008 median house price $532,810
2009 projected change -22.0%
2010 projected change -3.5%

7) Fresno, CA
2008 median house price $257,170
2009 projected change -21.6%
2010 projected change -3.3%

8. San Diego, CA
2008 median house price $412,490
2009 projected change -21.1%
2010 projected change -2.9%

9) Bakersfield, CA
2008 median house price $227,270
2009 projected change -20.9%
2010 projected change -2.5%

10) Washington, D.C.
2008 median house price $343,160
2009 projected change -19.9%
2010 projected change -5.7%

Sources: National Association of Realtors; Moody’s Economy.com

I wonder how the realtors are going to spin this one given that the NAR is one of the sources. There will undoubtedly be some seemingly great deals out there in the next couple years, but I can’t really imagine anyone taking the “It’s a great time to buy” reason anymore. Sure prices have come down a lot since a couple years ago, but just because people are hoping the decline will stop doesn’t mean it will. With the dwindling economy, the chances of a quick recovery are slimmer than ever.

Don’t forget, we’re only about halfway through the exploding ARMs that were taken during the bubble. We’re only at #24 on the x-axis on the infamous Credit Suisse chart.

This is going to be a long and painful RE recovery for all of us. I wish I had something more uplifting to share, but this was the headline that I woke up to this morning. It’s not a pretty sight out there and the storm is going to get worse before it gets better, but I hope people have learned their lesson. In this season of love and joy, take time out to be thankful what you do have in your life. When times are tough it seems like everything sucks, but we are still far better off than many people in other parts of the world. May you and your family have a safe and happy holiday season!




Popular Posts

RSS feed | Trackback URI

71 Comments »

Comment by Cato
2008-12-22 12:51:04

The only painful part is the wait. My wife this morning was saying how sorry she feels for the folks that can’t make their mortgage! Well, hey, we’ve been living in a apt, waiting for years, for the price to come down. It looks like the CNN prediction is for 2009 to be the big year for price reductions; but I’m sure they were saying back in 2007 that prices CANNOT go down since “we aren’t making more land!”

 
Comment by JL
2008-12-22 13:06:31

i was aiming for end of 2009..and maybe even earlier…but after seeing this report, i might just wait till at least now to the end of 2009.

 
Comment by Robert
2008-12-23 19:05:53

I was planning to invest big in California real estate a few years back,things didn’t work out for me rightly at that time and I was completely disappointed! but now after looking at these reports I am glad that things didn’t work for me!!!!!!

 
Comment by niki Subscribed to comments via email
2008-12-23 19:25:00

Is it me, or is San Marino bubbleproof?

Comment by Cato
2008-12-26 13:16:14

Looking at Zillows, there was a time where homes could be got for 500-600K, at least in the Mission District (around 2000). Last summer there were a couple homes offered at 800K. One ended up going for around 975k and one was taken off the market by sellers.

Comment by san marino resident
2009-01-31 00:23:53

There were quite a few houses that sold in the high 800’s in San Marino last summer. Most of them on busy streets, but that was still a breakthrough compared to the previous years where 900 was the entry price for San Marino. I chalked some of last summer’s brisk San Marino housing sales to the usual annual desperation to get into San Marino schools.
BUT this winter in San Marino sales have also been strong. lots and lots of houses have sold! Could be bottom-feeding. There’s a slight softening in the San Marino market in price per square feet but it is very minimal. maybe 5%.
So far San Marino is bubbleproof.
As far as I know San Marino housing prices have only dipped a few times in the last 50 yrs or so and the dips were just that — dips, not troughs.

Comment by Steve
2009-04-28 07:31:17

My father-in-law who lives in HK told me that several large investors from china were pooling their money to buy real estates in the LA area during the bubbling years. They probably made a fortune doing it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Wambo
2010-02-01 14:38:33

San Marino so far so good. As waell as South Pasadena.
John, R E Appraiser

 
 
Comment by Sean
2008-12-23 21:26:29

Looks like the party is just starting. Time to keep renting for a few more years.

 
Comment by Sharon Hollas
2008-12-29 02:49:35

I think the market could take quite a while to recover, 2009 is going to be a year for renting that is for sure.

Sharon Hollas – Surrey Real Estate

 
Comment by Ping Subscribed to comments via email
2008-12-29 17:00:20

The story for Arcadia might not be the same though. The price for houses in Arcadia has not dropped that much! Looks like the effect of the subprime would not be as big in Arcadia. Will the current trend of severity of job insecurity and growing conservatism in consuming affect the house price in Arcadia?

 
2009-01-05 11:25:50

I think 2009 will continue to fall, with the end of the year showing some stability. Strap yourself in, it’s going to be a fun ride.

Ryan Philipenko – Edmonton Real Estate Agent

 
Comment by Steve
2009-01-11 18:09:27

I’ve heard some buyers in escrow backing out due to crashing stock market. Apparently some people now has less money for a downpayment.

 
Comment by real estate jobs
2009-01-16 11:28:26

I had just read the other day that many “experts” were projecting the market to start turning around for the better by mid 2009? I guess that goes to show how much the majority of experts know.

–Patric

 
Comment by real estate jobs
2009-01-16 11:30:40

My mistake, forget my last comment, I totally just noticed that this post was from the end of last month. Maybe the experts have learned some new information since then. :)

2009-02-10 04:06:30

This is crazy, no end in site, and the 7 and 10 year ARMs have not all come due yet that is the scary part!! =o(

 
 
Comment by anonymous coward Subscribed to comments via email
2009-01-20 21:45:44

Looks like home prices for Arcadia actually went up +2% for 2008.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2009/01/how-2008-home-p.html

 
Comment by David
2009-01-29 18:37:46

haven’t posted in a while…

I just wanted to point out… This is going to rock all boats.

Go to itulip.com, or drhousingbubble.com for the details. If you think that one area is recession proof compared to another… Just wait until the Alt – A lies come in, and the option ARMs hit… Cus if Santa Monica and Malibu are seeing a decline…. No “area” is safe…

 
Comment by Steve
2009-01-30 15:03:26

People trying to ride out the housing market will get screwed in a deflationary environment. CASH IS KING! Everyone is thinking turnaround is in 2009 or 2010, but there is a real possibly that turnaround may be as late as 2015, according to Congressional Budget Office’s Jan. 8 report, and Suzie Orman.

Put your money into precious metals and in a couple of years you will have more than enough money for a down payment.

 
Comment by VP
2009-02-08 09:45:23

Cash is king! I am screwed I bought before the market crashed and I am seeing homes twice the size for half the price. I see why people are walking away. Unethical, but a business decision

 
Comment by Steve
2009-02-10 13:44:45

A friend of real estate agent told us that the offers has been coming in at 100k under listing prices, and she has been encouraging seller to lower price. There are still people interested in buying; you see many people going to open houses, except they are window shopping.

http://dqnews.com/News/California/HighEndSales/MDCA090202.aspx?ref=patrick.net

interesting quote from the above link:
“Around 24 percent of the $1 million-plus buyers paid cash, up from 14 percent in 2007. In the over-$5 million category, more than half of the purchases were cash. Of those who did finance their purchase, the median down payment was 30 percent of the purchase price. Lending institutions most willing to provide mortgage financing were Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Union Bank.”

 
Comment by David
2009-02-19 14:29:43

… this is a little off topic, but the way things are going… it is all the same topic. When you first look at it, you think it was just a subprime issue, then you do a little research and find out, that there may be issues with alt-a, and then… you have that moment when you say… holy @#$^…

This problem isn’t going to be solved with solutions from todays type of thinking, the solution for the problem is from tommorrows type of thinking. That sounds very contrite, but when you figure out that a lot of the ole school business models, auto industry, box stores, real estate, etc. will be going out of business in the near future, you begin to understand that this problem is like an onion, it has layers…

 
Comment by Katie Subscribed to comments via email
2009-02-22 10:50:53

I been looking at the listing and it seems that Arcadia area are not dropping that much.

Comment by JW
2009-02-22 18:07:18

I used to own a lending operation that primarily originated and repackaged conforming loans to Fannie / Freddie.

What the author doesn’t mention is that most Arcadia familys who buy here to live here do not buy with ARMs.

The people who bought with irresponsible financing were the flippers and small-time builders.

 
 
Comment by Steve
2009-02-23 22:03:56

A crack in the armor…

If you’ve been looking at the listing this week, it is not hard to discover sellers throwing in the towel in Arcadia, So. Pas, upscale parts of pasadena. Not yet for san marino, but its days are numbered.

Just to let you know in a secret. Yes it is true that Arcadia families do not buy with ARMS, but the problem is not enough buyers with adequate liquidity or financing. Jumbo loans rate, if lucky enough to qualify, are in the north of 8% range. People with money were hit hard by the stock market crash. New constructions in arcadia are forced to sell half-finished because bank wants more collateral.

This malaise is spreading to commercial loans, credit card, etc…hold on your wallet for a ride.

Comment by Anonymous Subscribed to comments via email
2009-02-24 20:24:24

By “throwing in the towel” you mean they have dropped their listing? I have seen the numbers of houses I’d be interested in drop. I hope this changes this summer. Anyway I’ve expanded my search to surrounding areas since sellers are too out of touch with reality.

928 Victoria (2bd/1 bath) was an interesting property. They asked 799k last year and the price slowly dropped to 708K. The seller even raised the price to 728K! What’s the rationale there? They paid 650k back in 12/06. They still have the Remax sign out but I dont see the listing up anymore on the website. If the property had gone in the low 600s, I’d had made an offer.

 
 
Comment by Steve
2009-02-25 14:40:44

what I mean by “throwing in the towel” is that sellers are realizing they are not getting enough bids, getting mostly low bids, and getting burned by people backing out due to financial contingencies. So now they are now willing to at least negotiate with a low offer, granted you have “all-cash” or no jumbo loans. Before you can’t even get a response with a low offer.

 
Comment by acai
2009-03-01 11:04:28

Back when you were posting this blog post were you expecting the current state of the economy? :) The graph can be extended.

 
Comment by David
2009-03-02 17:24:05

Hello, general question to ask the readership of this website…

I have sort of grown out of my current residence, sure I can tough it out, but….

So my dilemena is just that should I tough it out until the bottom hits aka the middle of 2011, or go rent a new place.

The second part of my question is.. if you knew that the price of property was dropping, does this also correspond to the price of rent as well…

 
Comment by David
2009-03-04 16:24:49

Calling all cars… here is my question…

So does rising unemployment = rising crime???

Everywhere I have looked, it looks like this is true.

However, what is the lag time? Meaning we just hit 10% unemployment when will crime rate begin to rise, and Where???

thanks

 
Comment by Anonymous Subscribed to comments via email
2009-03-08 13:23:26

Don’t BUY right now. Arcadia is going to be hit hard soon and prices will be dropped to 2001 prices by early 2010.

 
Comment by Steve
2009-03-14 10:18:17

this is really going to bring down the price of million dollar homes…

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/28/BU7O166J6Q.DTL

once a good tax shelter for the rich may lose its appeal as obama getting rid of mortgage deduction gradually.

Comment by Anonymous Subscribed to comments via email
2009-03-16 17:05:19

This probably does not apply to Arcadia buyers. They don’t most likely have very high income, but much savings.

 
 
Comment by Nadine
2009-04-02 09:31:57

I agree, don’t buy now.

 
Comment by mqo Subscribed to comments via email
2009-04-26 07:46:08

Arcadia prices are going back up.

 
Comment by Phantom600rr Subscribed to comments via email
2009-04-27 19:48:34

mqo,

Keep telling yourself that “Arcadia prices are going back up”. Perhaps if you said it out loud 3 times daily in front of the mirror, it might come true.

 
Comment by Ray Subscribed to comments via email
2009-04-28 05:39:02

Grace and Arcadian, where are you?? This is the time you are needed most and you guys are abandoning your post!

 
Comment by Steve
2009-04-28 07:26:43

We do see a pickup of Arcadia sales recently, possibly due to the low interest rate and the rebound of the stock market. I am giving up on Arcadia due to the fact that I think the school is not good for kids(kids drives bmw/mercedes to school), too far from my work(I rather live in San Gabriel or South Pasadena, a lot closer to downtown. The so-call Baldwin stockers are stocked with cheap new constructions. The new addition to the Arcadia mall was disappointing… You see little or none of the premier brands. No Chanel or LV willing to come to Arcadia, go figure.

Comment by Cato
2009-05-06 15:11:45

Arcadia does have a good school district: if you’re looking for opportunities and an environment for motivated and successful children. There are a lot of negatives to Arcadia. McMansions, materialistic children, and a mall that is growing to discusting size. I think it has just gotten too big. Soon the empty store space will be filled with 99 cent stores and karate dojos. The AMC has only brought gangbangers from Pasadena and made parking difficult. I miss it back when there was just Nordstroms, Ben Bridge, and Auntie Anne’s.

I still want to buy in Arcadia; definately North of Huntington. I have deep roots here. I must be nutz!

 
 
Comment by Leo Subscribed to comments via email
2009-05-04 15:47:44

I do see more activity in Arcadia even though prices are still ridiculous.

I do think prices will flatline for awhile or lose another 15 percent slowly (2-3 yrs).

Maybe it is true that the (ill-gotten) Chinese money won’t keep it propped up much, but you can’t deny the number of lookers every Sat / Sun.

PS if anyone wants a buyer’s agent that is not afraid to submit lowball bids, drop me an email.

 
Comment by copper Subscribed to comments via email
2009-05-07 23:33:23

Buy now, die later.

Comment by Cato
2009-05-13 10:12:57

Plenty of ARMs are resetting soon; competition among sellers should be fierce. Even if Arcadia isn’t directly affected by ARMs, a lot of buyers will be pulled toward South Pasadena, Monrovia, even San Marino. South Pasadena seems to have more and more homes for sell. Plus there are fewer “McMansions.”

 
 
Comment by AK Subscribed to comments via email
2009-05-13 15:52:55

No new posts snice 12/08.
Please post again.

 
Comment by Steve
2009-05-16 10:13:54

It looks like everyone is looking for a bargain these days. Price will come down in arcadia once the rents start to come down. There are more than ever “for rents” signs.

 
Comment by Fan of the show Subscribed to comments via email
2009-05-27 08:37:47

If you want to see someone jumping the shark check this listing out. Looks like the start of capitulation.

http://www.redfin.com/CA/Arcadia/420-W-Palm-Dr-91007/home/7238696

Comment by Anonymous Subscribed to comments via email
2009-05-30 18:00:16

Typical Arcadia McMansion. That would be an awesome home if it were located on Newport Beach or in Miami, but Palm St?! I think the neighbor’s 1940s cracker box is Section 8 housing. If I had millions to spend, I buy in San Marino, not Palm St!

 
 
Comment by Keith Subscribed to comments via email
2009-06-30 08:13:25

It looks like you guys are going to be waiting for a while because Arcadia is holding up great. Only area that will not hold up in Arcadia are the one located near El Monte and Irwindale.

Comment by Cato Subscribed to comments via email
2009-07-01 11:44:01

The part of “Arcadia” that is near El Monte isn’t really Arcadia. It’s unincorporated, which means it’s simply part of the County of Los Angeles. That also means El Monte schools; which aren’t really that bad, but still no Arcadia Unified. That’s why the homes are so much cheaper. I bet a good number of us here are lusting after Arcadia because of the schools. Otherwise there are plenty of fine(better) homes in San Gabriel and Alhambra for much less.

On another note, I wish the blog owners would start posting again! This string is getting ‘hella long!

 
 
Comment by Steve
2009-07-12 11:00:11

I agree the waiting part is agonizing. Arcadia is holding, but still on a downtrend, probably at a faster rate compared to neighborhoods that has already come down to earth. Why buy a house when you know you can buy it cheaper at a later day? If you want to stop paying rent, buy a comparable condo and trade up later. Or you can keep your condo for lease. Send your kids to private school. I don’t believe price will recover in a couple of years.

 
Comment by theaceisback Subscribed to comments via email
2009-07-30 10:33:43

Housing bottom wont be until 2013 and it will start to recline back in 2017 so just keep renting.

 
 
Comment by pakar bisnis online
2009-08-16 11:38:18

I think the market could take quite a while to recover, 2009 is going to be a year for renting that is for sure.

 
2009-08-18 12:16:21

So 2009 is almost over. Whta do you think, when it’s time to buy?

Comment by AK Subscribed to comments via email
2009-08-19 09:23:08

Probably not now.
I saw a second short sale in last 6 mths in 91007 a few days ago. I think the WSJ article mentioned by Steve is going to be true for Arcadia too. I don’t know if it can go down 60% from peak. But about 15% down form peak (by Zillow’s numbers) at this time is still quite high. I do not see any upside except a few bumps for next few yrs in Arcadia.

 
 
Comment by Salina Subscribed to comments via email
2009-09-07 22:13:32

Keep looking. My friend just bought an old house in Arcadia for $588k with 13k sq ft.

 
2009-09-30 13:37:25

it’s good to be realistic about things, people who think the rebound is going to happen sooner than later could get themselves in trouble. good way to end the article!

 
Comment by RIPGRACE Subscribed to comments via email
2009-10-09 12:23:06

RIP Saved by GRACE

 
Comment by Andrew
2009-10-16 13:33:59

this is very useful data. We also have detailed neighborhood statistics available here

 
Comment by Cato
2009-11-13 12:42:03

Yes, RIP, this was a fine blog.

 
Comment by Ray
2009-11-16 11:44:12

Did something happen to Grace? Where have the authors all gone?

 
Comment by johnwedan
2010-02-04 17:53:28

wooo… nice info

 
Comment by johnwedan
2010-02-04 17:57:20

nice info for reding

 
Comment by isa
2010-02-04 19:04:53

San Marino so far so good. As waell as South Pasadena.
John, R E Appraiser

 
Comment by Self Storage Clips Subscribed to comments via email
2010-02-15 10:44:58

Well, things have to get worse before they can get better.

 
Comment by Steve
2010-02-28 00:20:50

Prices dropping in Arcadia and So. Pasadena…may continue for a while

 
Comment by Anonymous Subscribed to comments via email
2010-03-02 22:27:47

its dropping and no one seems to be buying, so far so good!

 
Comment by ontohod
2010-03-07 21:57:18

hmm. i have to wait till i earn the money

 
Comment by jeeten
2010-03-09 13:06:29

well….very true that things have to get worse before they can get better.

 
Comment by Bernadine
2010-03-10 12:51:05
 
Comment by Elvira
2010-03-13 12:20:44
 
Comment by Heather
2010-03-15 20:16:15

What a great post. that you for the information.

 
Name
E-mail - never shown publicly
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.
TopOfBlogs Top Real Estate blogs Real Estate Real Estate Blogs - Blog Top Sites Site Meter Free Classified Ads - FreeAdLists.com